Stage 1 – Certified Translations, Media Evidence & Electronic Signatures

Hi everyone!

  1. Certified translations: I have a few documents in Italian that need translating. Can these be certified by a Tech Nation alumnus? I know this was possible in the past, but I’m not sure if it’s still accepted.

  2. Media recognition: I was featured in a Sifted article specifically about my experience navigating the UK immigration system, particularly the long and difficult process of obtaining my Innovator Founder visa. I’m considering using it as evidence of media recognition, but I’m wondering whether it might be counterproductive to include an article discussing immigration difficulties in another visa application. What do you think?

  3. Recommendation letters: Are electronic signatures other than DocuSign accepted, or would you recommend using DocuSign specifically?

Thanks so much for any advice or experience you can share!

Certified translations can be done by a qualified human translator or certified service. It does not need to be a Tech Nation alumnus specifically. The translation must include a certification seal or a signed statement of accuracy from a recognised body (e.g. ITI, CIOL, ATC). AI-generated translations are explicitly not accepted, so ensure the translator confirms human work only.

Media recognition: the Sifted article is risky. Tech Nation distinguishes between coverage about you versus coverage about a company/startup. A personal journey about immigration difficulties is about you, but the content (immigration struggle) may not demonstrate “recognition as a leader in digital technology.” Worse, discussing difficulties with a different visa route could invite scrutiny. I’d avoid using it for MC. Consider it for OC2 only if you can frame it around your expertise but even then, it’s weak.

Electronic signatures: DocuSign is recommended but not strictly mandatory. The critical requirement is that the audit trail shows the referee independently authored and signed the letter from their own device/IP. Any e-signature tool with a clear audit trail works; DocuSign simply provides the cleanest, most recognised trail. Hand-signed scanned letters also work but are less preferred.

thank you so much Benjamin for clarifying

@natalia_pazzaglia

Media recognition generally means that the media is recognising you for your work, achievements, impact, or contributions within your field.

If the article is mainly about your personal experience navigating the UK immigration system and the challenges you faced obtaining your Innovator Founder visa, it would be difficult to position that as media recognition of your work in the digital technology sector. It would be seen more as a feature about your personal journey rather than recognition of sector impact or achievement.

Also, the fact that obtaining the visa was a long and difficult process does not demonstrate sector advancement. Because of that, I do not see this fitting particularly well under any of the Tech Nation criteria.

Regarding recommendation letters, any credible electronic signature should be fine. It does not have to be DocuSign specifically. The important thing is being able to clearly show the authenticity of the letter, including metadata or other indicators that demonstrate it genuinely originated from the recommender. That is usually more important than the signing platform itself.

All the best.

what if its a normal scanned doc @raphael

@FredrichK Do you mean scanned recommendation letters?

yes refile: the endorsement letters

You mean the author signs by hand and scans to you?

yes sir. …right exactly

I wouldn’t recommend that approach, based on the rejection feedback I’ve seen recently.

ohhhhh so i nee docu sign