Seeking review: Senior DevOps Engineer: Exceptional Promise

1

Hello everyone, please I have all my documents ready to be submitted by the end of this month, please find the structure below: kindly help me look through it if this can suffice and if there’s anyone that can give me the time, I can show the actual documents

I am applying under digital technology (exceptional promise) as a DevOps Engineer

LoRs

LoR 1: Founder / senior security lead from Company A.
Confirms I led the infrastructure rebuild for a fintech/remittance platform serving about 800,000 users. Highlights the Heroku-to-AWS migration, ECS Fargate, CI/CD, blue-green deployments, security controls, database connection improvements, and cost reduction from about US$10,000/month to about US$3,500/month.

LoR 2: CEO / co-founder from Company B.
Highlights my contribution to payment infrastructure, cloud cost management, merchant-facing technical support, business reliability, and leadership potential in a fintech/payment environment.

LoR 3: CTO from Company C.
Highlights my technical depth, rapid progression, architectural influence, reliability, security, and performance contribution in an electric mobility company.

MCs

MC 1: Public recognition / thought leadership.
Evidence of recognition through technology publications, media commentary, and industry articles on fintech reliability, infrastructure, AI, and digital technology via NairaMetrics (shared on FB, X, Nairametrics site, Linkedin: got more than 2000 views combined), TechBuild Afrika, BusinessDay and also about 4 places where my names are mentioned on Business day concerning conversations around A.I, data privacy, Devops, etc (All in year 2026). If you type my name on Google: You should find these articles

MC 2: High remuneration.
Evidence that my salary is high compared with Nigerian DevOps/cloud engineering benchmarks, supported by offer letters and external salary comparison sources. (salary is in the top 1% of Nigeria’s top talent and with reasons why I earn so much: I also double as security lead)

OC1 - Innovation

OC1 / 1: Company C electric mobility infrastructure innovation.
I designed and contributed to infrastructure for an electric mobility platform that supported growth from about 28,000 to 75,000 connected bikes across nine countries. Evidence includes platform screenshots, EMQX/system evidence, microservices architecture, APISIX/API gateway work, Terraform/Ansible automation, EFS, PostGIS, Elasticsearch, observability, and cost optimisation. (with images)

2 Supporting references confirm that I played a critical role in the EV Maps infrastructure, led architecture/deployment of over 23 microservices, separated stateful and stateless workloads, and contributed to about US$61,033 in cloud cost savings

OC2 - Contribution Outside Core Employment

OC2 / 1: Mentorship and startup support.
Evidence of contribution through my DevOps/cloud training platform, practical lab environment, student support, and infrastructure guidance for early-stage products. ( 3 out of 5 founders sent an email attesting to this for end to end deployment of their applications (letter of appreciation) and they are live with images and architectural diagrams, the last founder deployment is in beta state, 2 students send email thanking me for solid training, plus one video)

OC2 / 2: Speaking and knowledge sharing.
A single evidence of speaking contribution on FinOps, cloud cost optimisation, AWS credits, cloud migration, and practical cloud infrastructure topics with many start up founders and over 200 attendees; video and images are available with linkedin link and coments

OC3 - Significant Technical Contribution

OC3 / 1: Company B payment gateway infrastructure.
Evidence of significant technical contribution to a merchant-acquiring payment gateway. This covers AWS architecture, WAF (has image), IP whitelisting(has image), private networking, access governance, deployment approvals, GitHub governance, GuardDuty, Security Hub, Macie, Detective, database archival, and operational reliability ( all with images, emails showing approvals, aws admin rights, Google workspace admin, slack admin, etc.)

OC3 / 2: Company A fintech/remittance infrastructure business impact.
Evidence of significant technical contribution to a fintech/remittance platform. This covers cloud migration from Heroku to AWS, ECS Fargate, CI/CD, blue-green deployments, Terraform, security controls, database connection improvements, improved release reliability, and cost reduction from about US$10,000/month to about US$3,500/month. Founder confirms this in recommendation letter for company A

Please Note: No open source contributions.

Please help!

@Raphael @Francisca_Chiedu

2

. Mentoring at a university or a single startup is not sufficient.

1 Like
3

Oh no, it’s not a university: it’s actually a lab that’s operated by me and we have helped 5 founders to deploy their applications: core banking application, visitor management system, fintech, a reminder app, fashion store: Deployed via kubernetes. I did this along with my mentees, founders sent me appreciation letters: 3 of them, 2 applications are still in beta state (currently deployed on dev environment)

4

The structure has two gaps.

MC1 with press coverage and articles works if the publications are widely recognised. NairaMetrics and TechBuild Afrika are niche - check whether Tech Nation assessors will view them as “recognised media publications” or dismiss them as industry blogs. BusinessDay is stronger. The “my name appears on Google” framing won’t land - assessors want curated, specific evidence, not a search suggestion.

MC2 with high salary is risky as a standalone MC piece. Assessors have flagged salary-only MC evidence as insufficient without supporting context showing why you command that salary (scarcity, specialist skills, competing offers). The “top 1% in Nigeria” claim needs third-party benchmarking - internal offer letters alone won’t satisfy this.

OC2 with your training platform and founder deployments is the weakest link. tunde1234’s comment is correct - informal mentorship or a personal lab environment won’t meet the “structured programme with selection criteria” bar. The appreciation letters from founders are testimonials, not third-party validation. Assessors have explicitly rejected mentorship that lacks: (1) a formal selection process, (2) documented curriculum, and (3) external recognition of the programme itself. Five founders you helped personally is a good story but reads as informal consulting, not a recognised mentoring contribution.

Consider swapping OC2 for OC3 if you have commercial impact evidence from the 800k-user platform, the cost reduction work, or the payment infrastructure.

1 Like
5

This is duly noted and yes I have screenshots from glassdoor, paylab and levels.fyi with screenshots to support the claim and also this:

My current compensation as Senior DevOps Engineer at present company is NGN 1,750,000 net per month, or NGN 21,000,000 net annually, excluding bonus and health insurance. Public Nigerian salary benchmarks for DevOps Engineers report substantially lower market ranges: Glassdoor lists a median total pay of about NGN 383,000/month and a likely range up to about NGN 612,000/month, while Paylab reports that 80% of DevOps Engineers in Nigeria earn between NGN 218,675 and NGN 1,104,138/month gross. My current net compensation is therefore above the typical and upper-market DevOps benchmarks identified, supporting the view that I am remunerated at a senior and comparatively high level in the Nigerian digital technology market.
Why this compensation is justified
• I own the AWS architecture, security posture, and CI/CD for a 17-microservice merchant acquiring gateway operating under PCI-DSS controls.
• I double as security lead and senior devops engineer in 54pay
• The platform processes payments across multiple high-risk merchant verticals (gaming, betting, e-commerce, digital services).
• I am the primary engineer responsible for the controls our auditors actually review: WAF, private-subnet networking, IP whitelisting, RBAC database access via Twingate, audit logging.
• I report directly into the CTO and have authority over architecture decisions without per-decision sign-off.
• Cost Savings
• Significant contribution
• Word class experience

I will remove OC3 entirely, I just don’t know if the rest will suffice

For Nairametrics and TechBuild Afrika; I thought they will be better because they are specifically for tech.
Thank you for your feedback @Akash_Joshi

6

Hi @akandeadedayo01

For your LOR, make sure the people writing them are established experts in the field, not just people with big titles. Not every CEO is an established expert. It is also strategic for them to talk about the area where you worked with them or for them. But there is more to a LOR than this. The guidance explains what each letter must cover, so make sure all those points are included.

MC1: Public recognition / thought leadership - When you say “public recognition,” what do you mean? You should be invited because you are recognised as an expert in the sector. For example, were you invited by NairaMetrics as a domain expert to give commentary?

Articles published only on social media are weak. Medium, Indeed, ResearchGate, Academia and similar platforms are also weak. It is good if Google shows your name, but what appears must show how your work and impact have advanced the sector. Listing the titles of your articles will help you get better feedback here. Articles that look promotional or like adverts are usually dismissed.

For MC2, a high salary alone is not enough. You still need to show how you have advanced the sector outside your paid job.

OC1 is mainly about innovation, not just designing or contributing. The way you described your work weakens the innovation part. Also, saying your work supported growth from 28,000 to 75,000 connected bikes across nine countries shows the platform, solution already existed. This looks like an improvement, not an innovation, and will likely be dismissed. A reference letter can support your claim, but it is not enough on its own. It must point to something that clearly meets the criterion.

OC2 Mentorship and startup support - “Evidence of contribution through my DevOps/cloud…” will not be enough to show mentorship. Also, three founders sending emails will not show that your work significantly advanced the sector. It sounds like you trained five people to build their own platforms, but it is not clear if what they built was important for the sector. How has this contributed or can contribute to the sector?

OC2 / Speaking and knowledge sharing - Were you invited to speak, or did you receive an appreciation letter, email for coming? Videos, images, LinkedIn links and comments are okay, but you must show that you were actually speaking on stage.

You listed OC1, OC2 and OC3. You are only allowed to choose two optional criteria. For OC3, what you listed can be okay, but make sure you show ownership and external sources and not what you designed or just images. A reference letter can support it.

You currently have about seven evidence sets. Removing two OC2s or two OC3s will leave you with five. This is not a strategic evidence lineup. To increase your chances, you should aim for at least eight. I usually recommend the ten. They will not all be strong, but some can complement and others can support other evidence.

To be honest, it is difficult to give very useful feedback without seeing the actual evidence you are submitting. I suggest you take some time, study the guidance, and work on building stronger evidence before applying. This will increase your chances.

All the best.

1 Like
7

Thank you very much @Raphael @Akash_Joshi @tunde1234 . I appreciate your opinions. I have taken all the feedback. Let me go back, work on myself, and then apply later in a year.I have a clear sense of what things are needed right now.

1 Like