Dear All,
Firstly, many thanks for the help and support on this forum, I’m a huge fan of this forum. I applied for Tech Nation Endorsement under the Exceptional Talent Route-Business Skills and received a rejection today. I’m hoping to get your feedback and guidance on filing an appeal. Is there enough in the application to appeal, and what do you think are the odds? As per the assessor, I do not meet a single criteria.
Is there anyone who was able to get all the criteria satisfied after appealing in this type of situation?
@scao @ask4jubad @Francisca_Chiedu @Sajjad_Bagheri_Baba @kokomansion @Chaitanya_Bapat @Mideade @artkulakov @May
@alexnk
My Profile
I’m a Global HR Tech Expert and Scale-Up Leader with over 15 years of experience in North America, Europe, and APAC. Out of which nine years have been in product- and SaaS-based companies.I mentor tech start-ups and advise CEOs/Founders on Digital HR Transformation, the HR Technology Roadmap, AI, and Automation.
I’m regularly invited to speak at global conferences on the Future of Work, Digital HR, HR Tech and AI, Digital Workplace & Employee Experience.I sit on Harvard Business Review Advisory Panel and the MIT Technology Review Global Insights Panel and was recently honored to be selected by Gartner as a Gartner Peer Community Ambassador.I’m currently on the jury of CogX Awards 2023 as HR Tech and AI expert.
My three LORs: All of the them have a very strong external profile.
- A top 100 HR Tech Influencer who authored six books on AI and HR
- A world-recognized HR Tech and Future of Work Expert based in the UK
- Chief Product Officer of a HealthTech Company (I supported their client group during my time at the company)
Evidence Submitted
MC (4 Evidences)
Awards-01
a) International Achievers Award 2021 for HR Tech
b) CogX Awards 2022- Known as Oscar of AI - Finalist under two categories: Recognizing Leadership 2022-CogX Expert and Recognizing Leadership 2022- Voice of Gen-Z
Judging-Rest of the World-02: Judge for Stevie Awards for HR and Thought-Leadership APAC and MENA
Economic Times Future-Ready Organizations Global Jury
Judging-UK-03- Judge for UK Global Business Tech Awards
Publications-04
-Article on HR Tech and its influence on Digital Employee Experience
-My Interview in the same magazine on scaling up tech companies
-My Opinion/Interview on AI in HR with UK’s top digital magazine
OC-2 (3 Evidences)
Public Speaking North America-01
a) Future of Work Conference USA
b) HR Tech Summit
c) Reference Letter - Future WorkConference USA
Public Speaking EMEA-02
a) Largest HR Conference of South Africa
b) New Work Festival Germany
c) Reference Letter - New Work Festival Germany
Mentoring -03
a) Mentor since 2019 with more than 120 + hours of unpaid and volunteer mentoring for Canada’s largest not-for-profit structured mentoring program.
b) (Evidence-Letter from the CEO -Canada’s largest not-for-profit structured mentoring program)
c) Mentor and Guest Speaker since Jan 2020 for Women in Technology and Cyber Security Program Cohorts: -Ran tailored workshops on new digital skills and job readiness for one of the largest not-for-profits that develops job readiness in newly landed tech immigrants in Canada
OC-3 (Significant Impact) (3 Evidences)
HealthCheck Talent Tool-01 -For a HealthTech Product Company - A tool to predict employees that may leave the Company-Reference Letter from Chief Information Officer confirming my contribution.
New Employee Onboarding Tool-02 - For the same HealthTech Product Company - designed new employee onboarding tool that raised the employee net promoter score in new joiners and reduces employee turnover. - Reference Letter from SVP of Engineering confirming my contribution.
Automated Requisition Approval Process for Hiring -03 - For a EdTech Product Company - Reference Letter from SVP-HR and Chief People Officer confirming my contribution.
Assessment panel feedback:
The candidate has applied with optional criteria 2 and 3 (work outside of occupation and impact). The candidate has not provided sufficient information to be endorsed for exceptional talent.
The candidate has provided a significant amount of evidence in the form of external links or information, such as images, email communications or video screenshots, without the ability to see the video, confirm audience engagement and evaluate the quality of the content. Other evidence is outside the permitted length of evidence. As per the guidelines, these do not have to be considered. Furthermore,
the majority of evidence is produced by the candidate with letters of support. A lack of external third-party evidence undermines its credibility. The candidate has not shown he has been recognised as a leading talent in the digital technology
sector in the last five years. The candidate has submitted evidence around judging awards, awards he has been nominated or won and publications written in. Much of this activity is not focused on tech but
on HR in a broader sense of digital transformation. Neither the awards nor the publications could be said to be internationally recognised prizes or awards for excellence, specifically in the digital technology
sector. Overall the candidate’s activity is not enough to show someone who is recognised as a leader nationally or at the forefront of a specific technical field in the digital sector.
The candidate has not demonstrated recognition for work beyond the applicant’s occupation that contributes to the advancement of the field. The candidate has undertaken some mentoring, but this
does not follow the guidelines as a recognised programme with selection criteria. Other speaking engagements and publications relate again to broader HR rather than tech specifically. Overall, there is not enough to
show the advancement of the sector.
The candidate has not shown significant technical, commercial, or entrepreneurial contributions to the field as an employee of a product-led digital technology company. The candidate has submitted:
evidence around HealthTech Company, but it is unclear the role of the candidate versus a broader team and whether this project is directly attributable to all of the impacts outlined. The candidate has also outlined work with EdTech on implementing transformation and productivity programs. This is interesting, but it does not show the wider impact on the business and is not compelling as a significant contribution to the field.