pleae can anyone help me with mine.
i did go back to the technation guide i think i mistook the recommendation letters as part of mandatory criteria. so i went back and did a bit of restructuring. and heres what i have
heres how I’ve structured my evidence into sets to find out which one is the strongest for the application:
Mandatory Criteria (MC) - Leadership and Significant Contributions:
Project: Digital Platform A
- Evidence: Blogs and YouTube mentions, code snippets, github pull and push request, cloud environment managed by me, database model diagram, ui screenshots, API documentation, live links.
- Why It Fits: Public recognition of your contributions to the development of Digital Platform A.
- Tech Nation Guide: Published material in professional or major trade publications.
Project: Pension Member Management Platform
- Evidence: Project summary, technical documentation, and architecture diagrams.
- Why It Fits: Leadership in developing a large-scale platform for a high-profile client.
- Tech Nation Guide: Led growth of a product-led digital technology company.
Project: Digital Academic Journal Platform
- Evidence: Indexed in academic platforms such as Google Scholar and ResearchGate, reference letter from editior in chief
- Why It Fits: Academic recognition of your contributions to this digital platform.
- Tech Nation Guide: Published material in professional or academic platforms.
Proof of High Remuneration
- Evidence: Salary evidence from multiple companies.
- Why It Fits: High compensation for leadership roles.
- Tech Nation Guide: Commanded high salary or remuneration.
Optional Criteria 1 (OC1) - Proven Track Record of Innovation:
AI-Based Project (Research Institution)
- Evidence: international Published paper, project summaries, citation metrics, and academic recognition. github repo with the project and screenshots, , reference letter from my professor during this project
- Why It Fits: Innovation in AI, supported by international recognition.
- Tech Nation Guide: Evidence of innovation/product development.
Peer-Reviewed Publications
- Evidence: Copies of my additional 2 international published papers, citation data, and impact metrics.
- Why It Fits: Shows innovative contributions in AI and machine learning.
- Tech Nation Guide: Proven track record of innovation via academic research.
Academic Journal Platform (same as the journal platform mentioned in MC)
- Evidence: Technical documentation, architecture diagrams (including embedded PDF reader and indexing features).
- Why It Fits: Highlights innovation in digital academic publishing.
- Tech Nation Guide: Innovation in product development and market traction.
Cloud Certification and Alumni Advisory Board Membership (Generation Initiative)
- Evidence: Certification, project work, and documentation of board role (with email snapshots of the interview and acceptance), meeting feedbacks, acknowledgement of contributions during the meeting.
- Why It Fits: Demonstrates innovative contributions to cloud technology.
- Tech Nation Guide: Contribution to cloud technology innovation.
Research Platform (Academic Institution)
i also work with a Lab in a university in Texas why i help their Phd Students build python projects to prove their concepts and use AI models. current still working on a project with him.
- Evidence: Project documentation and architecture diagrams, i can also bring email screenshots of our meetings and also the github repo, code snippets, etc
- Why It Fits: Demonstrates innovative contributions to academic research and technology.
- Tech Nation Guide: Evidence of innovation in research and technology development.
Optional Criteria 2 (OC2) - Recognition for Work Outside Immediate Occupation:
Mentorship and Assessor Roles (Educational Platforms)
- Evidence: Certifications as an assessor and mentor, student feedback, reviews, and technical assessments.
- Why It Fits: Contributions as a mentor and assessor, helping guide future talent.
- Tech Nation Guide: Mentorship or thought leadership outside immediate occupation.
Teaching (Educational Platforms)
- Evidence: Screenshots, feedback, and certificates from students.
- Why It Fits: Contributions to educating future professionals in the tech industry.
- Tech Nation Guide: Evidence of teaching or mentoring outside regular work.
Optional Criteria 3 (OC3) - Significant Technical Contribution:
Commits and Pull Requests (Proprietary Work)
- Evidence: Screenshots of significant commits and pull requests.
- Why It Fits: Demonstrates significant technical contributions.
- Tech Nation Guide: Significant technical contributions to digital products.
Architecture and System Diagrams
- Evidence: Technical diagrams from various platforms you have developed.
- Why It Fits: Significant technical contributions to platform design and development.
- Tech Nation Guide: Product designs or architecture diagrams demonstrating technical contributions.
i am aware that some documents appear in different sets but like i said i want to know which set is the strongest and if you can suggest a better arrangement