Kindly help me review my mandatory criteria if its okay. Please see below:
Mandatory criteria:
Evidence of my contribution building an innovative technology for Cyber-Threat Intelligence&Threat Hunting. screenshot of the designs I did for Cyber-Threat Intelligence&Threat Hunting dashboards, blog post on APT) and national award my company received for being the most innovative technology firm 2022(news clipping and links).
Evidence of my contribution towards the cyber security ecosystem by a group of experts acknowlegements through commendation letters and snapshot of the award I received.
Normally this is highlighting your recognition, you being known, emerging in the field. I see these evidences tend to showcase your impact (Optional Criteria) more than your (Recognition in the field)
If the article or award mention your name, this will boost your chances and my feedback on this might be different. And if not, better to checkout other potential evidences.
Please re-read the guide and i will leave this to my colleagues to add their views or perspectives that might differ from mine.
maybe list your full profile, including 10 evidences to check out your application in depth.
Please is it compulsory we attach the cv of the people writing the recommendation letters or links to there linkedin profile is enough? Please this is urgent
