“Having being recognised for receiving a national or international award for…”
How do we define what national or international award is?
Last month, someone saw a video I made via YouTube talking about 5 Things one ought to know about technation and reached out to me to clarify something about awards.
One of the reasons he wasnt endorsed was that “the award he had won was not 'internationally recognised”.
Stats about this award;
Top tier award for recognition for young people
Has existed for 16 years
Over 1,400 nominees
Over 1,600 stories captured
Over 200 winners
Over 15 categories
All stats which were stated, screenshot provided, audience proof shown, website screenshot + url provided, and pictures of the award certificate and recipient holding the award submitted.
This is a continetally recognised award. How come there was a refusal with the 'the award he is not 'internationally recognised", despite the evidence brought forward?
Applicant also provided proof of a second award for the best startup in a particular category, given to the winner (himself). This was an award given by an agency equivalent of the Council for Science and Technology in the UK. Evidence submitted was himself holding the Plaque, with clear inscriptions, and also the government agency website url, and details of what it does.
There was also news clippings (including audience, audience size, 6months website visitors using similarweb) to support showing the results of winning the award, international events, and mention.
How do we define what an international or national award is, what are the standards?
I appreciate your thoughts.