I would like to ask for the review of the documents (Exceptional Promise):
Three recommendation letters:
(1). from the Engineering Manager.
The contribution of my work and programming skills in the company (say Company_A) we worked for. We are not working at Company_A anymore.
(2). from the Lead Analyst (UK).
I am working in the UK more than 1 year with the the lead analyst. This letter contains the importance of my work in this British company (say Company_B), and my future contribution to the technology in the UK.
(3). from the PhD supervisor
My research works in the PhD course (machine learning), and its importance in tech field.
Mandatary Criteria:
(4). Reference letter from the previous CEO of Company_A
To clarify my contribution led the company success and had good collaboration with the customer, and revenue/benefit growth gained from my work.
(5). The press-release issued by the customer of Company_A.
This press-release is for the collaboration with the Company_A and the customer.
(6). The program of my seminar talk of the product of company_A.
I did a presentation at the seminar and the program mentions I am the presenter. Here, the number of attendees is not written in the program (only maximum capacity of people). Meanwhile, the reference letter in (4) mentions approximate number of audiences.
For OC3:
(7). Employment certificate from Company_B
My title, salary, when I joined.
(8). Documentation of my work at Company_B.
The design, specification of the machine learning platform (all by myself) and its benefit.
(9). Reference letter from the Lead Engineer at Company_B.
To clarify the importance of my tasks and how this work helps our products.
For OC4:
(10). The diploma of my PhD (engineering)
(11). The screen shot of my Google Scholar page.
About 40 citations in total.
(12). The lecture slide from an European university citing my journal paper.
This slide contains the screenshot of my journal paper.
(13). The certificate of prize of my conference paper during the PhD course.
I worry about the documents especially (6), as it does not have information of number of audiences. Also, despite it was occurred in few years ago, the link is not available anymore (because of the update of the website). So I will have to submit the screenshot from Wayback Machine.
If anyone have any advices or comments for my documents, I am really glad to know.
Thank you so much.