Hey all! Wanted to share my submission plan to see if anyone will come up with feedback. Will provide further updates as I go through the process.
Background
I’m a software engineer working in the crypto space. After finishing the uni I got a job as a full-stack engineer in a very early-stage blockchain startup. After working there for 1 year, I took a quick break and joined another startup as Frontend Lead. I was working there for 1.5 years full-time and then 0.5 years part-time as a contractor. After that, I took a break for about 9 months as I focused on learning and working on my projects. Finally, a month ago I got a new job (senior frontend engineer) and decided it’s time to apply.
I’m applying outside of the UK.
Documents
- CV (will provide an extended version of my normal 1-page CV, focusing on building a narrative and covering important parts of each project. Will also include some of my personal projects here as they are relevant to the case. Thankfully all my experience in product-led companies so shouldn’t be a problem)
- Personal Statement (I plan to focus on my background here, as well as provide my motivation to move to the UK and what kind of contributions I plan to make there).
- Letters of Recommendation
- 1 — CEO of the startup I worked for before.
- 2 — CEO of the startup I was consulting/helping. Hopefully, it’s ok that it was consulting, the company itself is product-led, and I was providing a technical contribution
- 3 — CTO of the startup I’m working on right now. I’m a bit worried since I joined the company a month ago, but I think that given I already made a significant contribution it should be fine?
- Evidence
-
Mandatory Criteria
- Proof of my salary/contracts, with the base salary and options included. I also plan to provide a comparison with local salaries since the difference is pretty significant.
- Projects I made with the links to articles covering it. Those projects are not very big, but since there are a few of them, and there is a public track of those written by 3rd parties I think those are pretty convincing
- Hackathons I won/finished as a finalist, including links to the hackathons themselves as well as a few media articles covering me personally as a winner. Again, there will be 3-4 of those hackathons.
-
Optional Criteria 2 (activity outside of work)
- Open-source projects I made/maintain. Again, there are quite many of them. I plan to cover 3-4 most impactful ones (100+ stars, tens of thousands of downloads on npm, has external contributions/forks)
- Open-source projects I made significant contributions. I think that my open-source contributions are going to be one of the main strengths of the case, so I plan to split it into two evidence pieces. Here, I will talk about 2-3 significant contributions I made to popular open source repositories.
- Publications. Here, I plan to talk about articles that got published on FreeCodeCamp, as well as some articles I published on my blog and on dev.to
-
Optional Criteria 3 (impact)
- Main contributions on my first job (featuring equity I was given, some media mentions and the source code)
- Main contributions on my second job (featuring equity I was given, some media mentions, reference letter, source code on github)
- Main contributions on my third job (featuring equity I was given, reference letter, source code on GitHub). Again, I’m a bit worried that I started working there only recently. Actually, I want to use it to my advantage, showing how much I made in a very small time, would be interesting to hear your thoughts.
-
Mandatory Criteria
That’s the plan at least. Please let me know if something seems off or requires more clarifications/evidence in your opinion
Regards, Timur.