congratulations!
if you haave some time, can you give a brief overview of your submitted docs.
congratulations!
if you haave some time, can you give a brief overview of your submitted docs.
Congratulations, do you mind sharing your story and how you put it out to TN. Thanks
Yoh csn send the endorsements tesm an email thstbhas your urn and date of birth, you may need to withdraw your applications and resubmit yohr evidence.
Congratulations!
Could you please provide a breakdown of the submitted documents? Thank you.
I contacted endorsement team via GlobalTalentEndorsements@homeoffice.gov.uk with proper subject line approximately 13 days ago but have not yet received a response. In the meantime, I am still attempting to regain access to my Gmail account and am currently waiting for the advised 72-hour period before trying again, as suggested in a reddit thread.
Hi everyone, I know posting rejection pro formas can be hard, but they’re genuinely helpful for the rest of us who are still navigating the process. If you’re comfortable sharing, just censor the PII and please post the pro forma text or at least a short evidence summary of what was submitted and what feedback you received. As for those who were endorsed, you could also link to your evidence summary in another post.
We all benefit from this kind of transparency, and it helps keep the community informed, even the experts need to stay updated. Thanks to everyone who shares and helps others learn from their experience.
imo i can understand why people dont want to post proforma. but successful applicants doc overview is much more beneficial so that people can know what angle TN is focusing on nowadays.
Honestly, anyone is fine, though I’d argue the opposite. It’s just that while preparing our applications, we peruse the information other people post after they get their decision. This helps us know what we need to do and what we need to avoid, especially as TN silently upgrade their standards.
So if we end up gatekeeping our proforma feedback/success stories because of how we feel, then the pool of recent knowledge keeps dwindling, effectively reducing the effectiveness of the community.
Some people here clamoured for others to post their feedback in this thread - sometimes insensitively, but when they eventually got theirs, they went silent. It’s so hypocritical to watch.
It’s basically just giving back to the community that helped you.
Hi everyone, just got my account approved to post. First want to thank everyone who shared on this forum and it means a lot. I submitted my application for exceptional promise on 31 Mar late afternoon and still waiting for the referral. I wonder if anyone is on a similar timeline and waiting?
Might need to be patient. Mine took about 22 day to 25 day to be referred. Cheers
Hi Guys, i am here to come and tell you all that there is a means to sabotage peoples efforts by Tech Nation and I’ll advice everyone before waiting money to apply, ensure you are they meet their standard.
Ensure everything you do contributed to the advancement of the digital technology sector. Tools practices. Etc and you case is well identifiednto truly do this. If you do mentorship ensure your mentee has evidence that advance the digital technology sector. Same as speaking. Same as the company you work. How does your work advance the digital technology sector?
Based on my appeal. These are things I saw and I think it’s better to say it so everyone looking to apply sees it before paying these people! DO NOT PAY THEM YOUR MONEY IF YOUR EVIDENCES DO NOT SPEAK THESE THINGS. Also read the notion guide they updated it with some definition. Goodluck to everyone.
Also I Believe people getting it needs to start sharing too instead of being quick to ask people to pay money. See anyone that didn’t get it in 2026 and ask you to pay money. I’ll advice you be careful Because things have changed! So except the person has had any 2026 success. DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY. Tech nation is moving mad and I understand it’s to filter people. Hence why I am begging you not to waste your money till you are sure your evidence is prepared.
@Sisilizzzy I understand that your experience may not have been positive, and I respect your perspective. However, I don’t think it’s fair to generalise or discourage others based on that alone, as people do have different outcomes.
For instance, just yesterday, someone I guided was successfully endorsed, and there have been several others over the past few months. While I respect everyone’s privacy, I think it’s important to highlight that one experience doesn’t reflect everyone’s reality. With permission, I’ll be sharing one of these outcomes soon to encourage others, and we’ve also seen people here share their own endorsement successes.
From your comments, it seems there may have been some key elements that weren’t fully in place before applying. It might be worth taking some time to review those areas and ensure everything is properly aligned before trying again.
All the best.
Nah i am not discouraging ooo, I said if their evidence doesn’t align with the new rules there’s no need paying for it they should ensure they’re prepared well.
Any one got review decisions. Mine got rejected again unfortunately
Review: 12 April
Result : Rejected on 17 April
In the next submission will tech nation looks into my last application
@Tom no they treat every application as unique and don’t refer to past applications
To buttress the fact on @Sisilizzzy statement, Tech Nation assessment is also Assessor based. I received my appeal response yesterday and they said that one Assessor might accept an evidence and the other Assessor might not when using similar evidence to reapply.
One might be eligible based on the eligibility criteria but they assess above the eligibility criteria. Exceptional Promise candidate might have to submit an evidence that should be acceptable for Exceptional Talent.
Do you think it’s fair to say one assessor may think the evidence is good others reject it. There should be a standard procedure
Hi I am sharing my timeline (success) here.
3.16 - submitted stage 1 application, sent material to the email
4.4 - material forwarded to the Tech Nation
4.10 - endorsement received