Optional criteria 1: I teach at a premier institute part time on a digital technology subject.
Optional Criteria 1 is “a proven track record for innovation as a founder or senior executive of a product-led digital technology company or as an employee working on a new digital field or concept”. How is teaching at an institute an evidence of OC1?
Optional criteria 2: I created data migration
OC2 is " * proof of recognition for work beyond the applicant’s occupation that contributes to the advancement of the field" - how is “created data migration” an evidence of this.
Any feedback for improvement areas? Please suggest.
Please understand that Global Talent Visa is for people who can showcase being exceptional or talented in some form. Nothing in what you wrote even seems to remotely making an attempt to showcase anything exceptional. I am not saying your profile isn’t, just that what you wrote here doesn’t showcase it in any form.
Sorry, I should have done better formatting. Please read optional criteria 2 as optional criteria 1 and vice versa. Let me edit the question. Any feedback on mandatory criteria?
I think it’s helps to be direct so prospecting applicants don’t waste applications fees when they don’t have evidence strong enough for endorsement. There are folks here I have given my honest feedback, they still go ahead and
Even in that case, I am not convinced that “data migration” is something that is “a proven track record for innovation”. All engineers need to do data migrations.
As for teaching part time in an institute, you probably need to prove how that is going to show “advancement of the field”. You might be able to, but the evidence needs to showcase advancement, not just the fact that you were participating.
I have list of students who go placed as data scientist and working now as a result of my teaching. I can add their recommendation letters or letter from you the institute.
Any feedback on mandatory criteria and recommendation letters?