Ideal 10 Evidence split across MC & OC criterias

Stage 1
1

I’m preparing my Tech Nation endorsement application and would love some advice on how to structure the 10 supporting documents for the strongest possible case.

  1. How many documents are ideally recommended for the Mandatory Criterion (MC)?
  2. How many for the Optional Criteria (OC) if I’m targeting OC2 and OC3?
  3. Is there a recommended minimum or maximum number of evidences per criterion? For example, could submitting too many documents under one criterion be counterproductive?
  4. What’s a good strategy for distributing the documents across the criteria—especially if one of the OCs is comparatively weaker?

Thanks in advance for your insights!
Suyash

2

Hi @suyash

Please go through the guide. Read it carefully.

In regards with ur questions:

  1. 3-4
  2. Again 3-4 (depends on your evidences, story)
  3. The min (as per the guide) 2 evidences. No max for each criteria. However you should distribute them well amongst all criteria
  4. Most used and recommended is (4 Mandatory, 3 for each optional). However, ive seen successful cased providing (2,2,2). It depends on how strong your applicant and case is.
3

Thanks @Maya, follow up question: Let’s say if one evidence is not deemed strong enough for MC out of the 4 submitted, will that lead to rejection of the whole criteria, same question for OC ?

4

Hi @suyash

Every evidence should be strong and independent on its own to pass the criteria. However, min required 2. So if you submit 4 evidences for a criteria. At least 2 must be strong enough to get endorsed.

3 Likes