Documents review- Digital Marketer

Stage 1
1

Hi there, I am a digital marketer with over four years experience. I have completed my all evidences to apply endorsement as an exceptional promise.

Here is my short summary for evidences.

  1. CV 2 pages

  2. Letter of Recommendation 1 ( CEO of x company, provides me as an individuals person, not from company)

  3. Letter of Recommendation 2 ( Bid manager of PwC company in the UK, provides me as an individual person, not from company)

  4. Letter of Recommendation 3 ( CEO of x company, provides me from company)

  5. Personal Statement one page with 490 words, that my plan in the UK & background.

Mandatory Criteria on supporting documents:

  1. Shows Email marketing campaign success with last 3 months $1M+ opportunity generated + Confirmation letter from SaaS industry.

  2. Shows Google Search Console Dashboard success with last 3 months results 279k+ impressions with 11k+ click + Confirmation letter from client.

  3. Shows my YouTube channel dashboard results. 429k+ impressions & 43k+ views through organic way. No paid advertising or collaboration. I spend time suddenly on my YouTube channel and make this results. I know this is not huge, but I shows as content creator.

Optional Criteria 1:

Innovation

  1. Shows Startup event organiser, I have organised an event for given opportunity to my local entrepreneurs. Scaled 3 days of Young Startup opportunity, and managed 26 stalls, 20+ Sponsor & funding almost is $7000. And I have 2 confirmations letters from Stallers, they’re participated in the Startup event.

Optional criteria 4:

Mentorship

  1. Shows as mentor about 12 months on the tech agency. I mentored digital marketing over hundreds students with six batch. And got Best Rising Star for outstanding performance of mentorship. I attached the award & Confirmation letter from the agency.

Note: each confirmation letter is fully on A4 page. Overall, I have 10 supporting documents within confirmation letter. And total is 15 with CV, personal statement, letter of recommendation.

Thank you so much for read the articles. And ensure please what about my evidences.

2

@pahuja @Akash_Joshi @Francisca_Chiedu

3

Your evidence shows good initiative, but let’s strengthen a few areas. Evidence 2 and 3 from your Mandatory Criteria will most likely be rejected. I’ve reviewed applications in the past where that was the case. Tech Nation requires events/speaking roles with 100+ attendees or main stage participation. Do you have any such evidences?

For the mentorship evidence, the official guide requires proof of structured programs with selection criteria - does your agency letter mention program scale (participant numbers) and how your mentorship advanced the field outside commercial activities? Additionally, it’s OC2 not OC4 right? Have you done your research?

It also seems doubtful that organising events qualifies for any of the criteria.

4

Thank you for your response. Should I keep mandatory criteria of 2 and 3 on optional criteria? And one of my big mistake was mentorship! It is Optional criteria 2, first I am considering this as optional criterion 4.

Do you have any more suggestions, that my evidences look strong and very good chance to get endorsement.

Thank you

5

Hard to say without looking at the actual application. I don’t think evidence 2 or 3 are valid for any requirements. They might be okay as supplementary evidence but definitely not the primary one.