Hello,
I wanted to ask if I can appeal second time.
In my first application, my MC and OC3 were rejected and OC2 awarded . It looks like they were not able to open evidences . Now they awarded OC3 too but MC rejected .
My MC documents are as follows
- MC led team/product growth - Here i demonstrated how I helped my company in securing clients and growing the team from 3-4 to 25 - 30 and building technical capabilities.
They did not comment on this part at all . - MC Awards and recognition : Here i showed a national award that i received after my work in sustainability apps development. Not sure how they can disregard this award which is well reputed and the selection criteria and process is well documented on the website and the awards are given to tech industry leaders.
3)Published Articles : i had written articles at influencerUK magazine and given interview but they completely disregarded this too. - Reference letter from a Lead engineer at other company where i cracked an interview
Below is the Appeal response from them:
Regarding the mandatory criteria, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate the applicant has been recognised as a leading talent in the digital technology sector. The previous assessment found there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate extraordinary ability or expertise to be leading talent at the forefront of the sector. The applicant has provided additional context regarding the awards. We have reviewed the award websites where available and see no evidence of notable digital technology industry figures involved in the selection process. Looking into the published articles, we do not consider the articles reflective of industry recognition. The applicant has not met the mandatory criteria.
Optional Criteria 2 requires recognition for work outside of the applicant’s immediate occupation that contributed to the advancement of the sector. The previous assessment agrees the evidence demonstrates field advancement. The applicant has met the requirements for OC2.
Optional Criteria 3 requires that the applicant should have made significant technical, commercial or entrepreneurial contributions to the field as a founder, senior executive, board member or employee of a product-led digital technology company. The previous assessment found the evidence lacked clarity of impact, results directly linked to the applicant. However, we revisited the evidence again and demonstrated the direct impact of the applicant’s work. We agree the applicant has demonstrated they meet the requirements for OC3.
How can I appeal again? I think it is clearly error , they did not see the growth nor commented on it