Hi Everyone! I recently applied for a Global Talent Visa under the technical route, and the advice on this forum has been incredibly helpful throughout the process. I’m sharing my experience to help others in the future.
I applied for talent since I thought I met the criteria, but got promise. I’m happy with that, but if anyone has inputs on what I could have done differently, please do share.
Timeline: Applied on March 9th, got endorsed on March 20th. I wasn’t tracking edits too closely, but I did see at least 3 edits. I applied from inside the UK.
Criteria Selected: MC, OC2, OC4.
Years of Experience: Just under 5 as a Software Engineer, including at FAANG.
References:
LoR1: Director from FAANG company talking about my leadership of a project, and it’s impact (worldwide media coverage, adoption etc.)
LoR2: Director from previous team in FAANG, talking about my contributions and impact to a novel infrastructural project with great impact.
LoR3: Professor who I published research with.
Evidences:
MC:
- Global Media Coverage of my feature, along with proof of my leadership of that feature.
- Speaking engagement at a top developer conference. The conference had >1000 attendees.
- Salary consistently showing top 1-2% income in UK over the past few years.
- Strong performance.
OC2: Contributions outside of work
- (RE-USED) Speaking engagement
- GitHub repo owned, and maintained by me. Numerous stars/forks and contributions from the community.
- Mentoring
- Increasing access to the tech sector - shown through bonuses etc.
OC4: Academic contributions
- Published research in a top journal (think Nature, Science) (I was not the first author)
- Impact of research. e.g. citations, use in digital products with 10000s of users.
- Academic track record at top-ranked universities including distinction.
Personal Statement: Tied it all together, and added a brief note on my wish to contribute more outside of my core work through mentoring/advising etc. Also briefly explained why the UK was a good fit.
Retrospective:
- I delayed applying for this for a while because I wasn’t sure if I had a strong enough profile. So I would recommend others who are on the fence to try - you might be surprised.
- I wasn’t sure if not being first author affected the strength of evidence (8). Ultimately, it worked out, although perhaps this played a part in why I got promise and not talent.
- Related to the above point, although I’m happy with promise, perhaps I should have gone for the standard OC2 and OC3 combo and re-used my MC along with some additional evidence for OC3. Any thoughts?
Hope this helps people out!